Welcome to Leeds Confidential
Reset Password
The Confidential websites will be undergoing routine updates. This may cause the sites to go offline. We apologise in advance for any inconvenience.

You are here: Leeds ConfidentialBusiness.

North Wants To Secede From South - Over Trains

"We can do it ourselves," says the North

Published on July 3rd 2012.

North Wants To Secede From South - Over Trains

AUTHORITIES in Greater Manchester, South and West Yorkshire have formally proposed to the Government that decisions about rail services in the north of England should be devolved to the north of England.  A combined franchise to succeed the current Northern and TransPennine franchises should be specified and managed from the north of England, rather than from London. 

Our proposals for rail devolution will build on the strong working relationships the north of England has developed, for example, in making the case over the past three years for the Northern Hub. 

The proposals will focus on economic growth through more capacity for people to get to work, more frequent and faster services between the main centres of the north, and improvements at stations and in rolling stock.  Decisions about railways in the north of England will be made in the north of England. 

With over 80% of local and regional train services running through their areas, West Yorkshire and York, South Yorkshire and Greater Manchester would make up the core members of the new franchising body, and work with authorities across the North to develop strategies, specifications and manage future franchises. 

“In West Yorkshire, Metro already spends over £70m annually supporting 25m journeys on local train services and we are certain that we can use our local knowledge and industry experience to introduce measures that would improve passenger services," said Metro Chairman Cllr James Lewis.

“Our plans will deliver better value for money from rail funding, and ensure expenditure is better aligned to other local spending programmes, and the priorities of Local Enterprise Partnerships in driving economic growth in our cities and across the North.”

“Our proposals for rail devolution will build on the strong working relationships the north of England has developed, for example, in making the case over the past three years for the Northern Hub. By creating a common approach across the North we believe we will be able to secure improvements to the railway that are better focussed on the needs of the North," said Cllr Andrew Fender, Chair of the Transport for Greater Manchester Committee.

"Our aim is to shape services at local levels, while at the same time working together on region-wide issues such as developing better inter-regional services between major centres through further electrification.  We all share a strong interest in ensuring rail in the north plays a bigger role in contributing to rebalancing the UK economy. We also want to get the best out of the £1 billion Government has already committed to the Northern Hub and north of England electrification programmes; these programmes will deliver benefits that spread from Liverpool, to Newcastle, and from Carlisle to Hull.”

A key challenge faced under the new arrangements would be the upgrade of rolling stock. Cllr Mick Jameson, Chair of South Yorkshire Integrated Transport Authority, said: “A key outcome from this process is to provide a framework for investment in better trains, so that there is more capacity for growing passenger numbers, and trains are of increasing quality to attract more people to the railway.”

"Enabling us to react quickly to local needs will greatly enhance the attractiveness of rail for commuters and leisure travellers alike, provide economic incentives for businesses, and improve the case for further investment.  Public consultation of the specifications for the new franchise will begin later this year."

Like what you see? Enter your email to sign up for our newsletters which are chock-a-block with more great reviews, news, deals and savings.

Matt RigbyJuly 3rd 2012.

Please. Please, please, please.

I cannot bear paying more and more every year on train tickets and seeing no improvement, while improvement in London trains is almost constant.

I cannot bear having to get on "pacer" diesel trains. Trains that are over 40 years old and should have been taken off the tracks 20 years ago.

Northern Rail suck money out of their customers and the ONLY thing they care about is profit and shareholders.

1 Response: Reply To This...
David HowardJuly 4th 2012.

Couldn't agree more Matt. Continuing e-mail correspondence with Northern Rail usually shows extraordinary arrogance and refusal to accept any responsibility.
I remember seeing Michael Potillo's face when he was forced to travel on a Pacer during his "Great Railway Journeys" series. Bit of a shock to him I think.

DavidJuly 10th 2012.

It is not Northern Rail fault for the lack of investment in new trains or station improvements or new track.The problem is national government always see investment in London as more important.We have a Labour council,but the 13 years of Labour government were just as biased towards investing in London.

1 Response: Reply To This...
RevaulxJuly 10th 2012.

Agreed, but the superiority of local train services in West Yorkshire over Greater Manchester's proves that local government does have the ability to make a difference. Alas, TFGM can't see beyond its precious Metrolink

To post this comment, you need to login.Please complete your login information.
Or you can login using Facebook.

Latest Rants

Tony Alex

... and why do so many diet products pride themselves on being 'real chocolate flavour'??

 Read more

So I get an email from Manchester Confidential entitled 'reasons not to go on a diet' and scroll…

 Read more


 Read more

Agreed, but the superiority of local train services in West Yorkshire over Greater Manchester's…

 Read more

Explore The Site

© Mark Garner t/a Confidential Direct 2022

Privacy | Careers | Website by: Planet Code